uiopsy
Give your agent a pair of human eyes for design review.

Your agent ships front-end UI.But it can’t actually confirm the design it created is any good.That’s where we come in.

How it works
Your agent sends a URL. A human reviews it. Your agent gets the fixes.
How long it takes
Usually inside two hours, start to finish.
Agent-first
Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, Cowork, and more.
What you get
A ranked list of fixes your agent can action and commit.
§ 01 · How it works

Your agent sends a URL.A human reviews it.Your agent gets the fixes.

Step 01Agent-native

Your agent submits the link.

  • Send a staging, preview, or production URL from the workflow you already use.
  • Add scope, access notes, and the specific design question you want answered.
  • Use Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, Aider, Windsurf, Zed, Cowork, or paste the URL yourself.
Step 02Usually under 2 hours

A human designer reviews it.

  • The reviewer is a real person, not a model and not an automated scan.
  • They check hierarchy, trust, clarity, friction, conversion, mobile rhythm, and visual taste.
  • They use the page like a first-time user, then write feedback your agent can actually act on.
Step 03Ready to act on

Your agent gets feedback in a helpful format.

  • Findings are prioritized by severity so your agent knows what to fix first.
  • Each note explains the problem, why it matters, and what a stronger version should do.
  • You get a readable email, and your agent gets webhook delivery when you provide an endpoint.
§ 02 · Why you’re here

AI-built UI has a quality ceilingthat’s stopping you from being fully hands-off.

The build passes every test and the page still feels wrong, for reasons your users notice three seconds before they can name them.

It all looks the same.

  • Rounded corners.
  • Reasonable gradients.
  • The same four-color palette as everyone else.

Defaults all the way down.

Edits make it worse.

  • One button changes and the type scale drifts.
  • One section added and the rhythm breaks.
  • One color tweak and the palette goes off-key.

Death by a thousand prompts.

The page still works.

  • Weak UI doesn’t throw errors.
  • Bad design doesn’t crash production.
  • Bounces look like product churn, not design failure.

Failure that doesn’t show up in your test suite.

Case #1: Purple all the way down.

Good afternoon, Alex 👋

Here’s what happened this week

ExportUpgrade ✨
Total Revenue
$127.4K
↗ +32.5% vs last month
Active Users
8,492
↗ +12.8% this week
Conversion Rate
4.2%
↗ +0.8pp

You had a great week.

All three of your top metrics are up compared to last period. Tap a card to see the breakdown by source, and export the whole dashboard as a PDF when you’re ready to share it with the team.

View details →
What we’d flag
  • Purple gradient backdrop.
  • Glass-morphism sidebar that communicates nothing.
  • KPI cards with green ↗ arrows.
  • Gradient pill buttons and an “Upgrade ✨” CTA.

Every Tailwind + Inter + Framer-template dashboard from 2024, in one screen.

Case #2: The 4-pixel catastrophe.

Account Settings

Manage your profile and preferences

ProfileSecurityBillingNotificationsTeamAPI Keys

Personal Information

Update your name and contact details

A
Profile Photo
PNG, JPG up to 5 MB
Upload
Make my profile publicly visible to everyone on my team
Send me a weekly activity digest email on Mondays
CancelSave Changes
What we’d flag
  • Labels glued one pixel from their inputs.
  • Cancel and Save touching like they’re about to kiss.
  • Buttons of three different heights in one row.
  • 38 px top padding, 6 px bottom.

The 8-point grid applied with a random-number generator.

Case #3: The models are overloading your copy with bullshit and jargon.

New: Advanced AI Capabilities Now Available

Transform Your Workflow with Revolutionary AI

Leverage cutting-edge artificial intelligence to seamlessly supercharge your team, unlock powerful insights, and empower your business to move faster than ever before. Whether you’re a startup or an enterprise, Synapse is designed to elevate every aspect of your workflow.

Explore Platform →Book a Demo
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Trusted by 10,000+ teams worldwide
What we’d flag
  • Eight stacked SaaS verbs: Leverage, Supercharge, Unlock, Empower, Elevate.
  • “Revolutionary AI” gradient headline that says nothing.
  • “Trusted by 10,000+ teams” with zero named customers.
  • A five-star review from nobody.

What an agent writes at 2 a.m. when nobody’s there to tell it to stop.

Case #4: Assets, shapes, and pictures placed by a blindfolded person.

Meet the team

The humans making the future of work possible

S

Sarah Chen

Co-founder, CEO

“We’re passionate about transforming the way teams collaborate.”

M

Marcus Rivera

Head of Product

“Every day we’re building the future of intelligent work.”

💫
J

Jamie Park

VP Engineering

“Shipping at the speed of thought, powered by AI.”

What we’d flag
  • Profile photos stretched into ellipses, no aspect ratio set.
  • Sparkle emojis floating at random rotations.
  • One sparkle planted on top of the subject’s face.
  • Gradient placeholders presented as real avatars.

A designer would have set one size, one shape, zero sparkles.

§ 03 · What makes it work

A human with taste.
On call for whatever your agent just shipped.

Budget you control

Stays inside your budget.

  • Prepay credits up front.
  • Set a spend ceiling per project.
  • Whitelist which environments your agent is allowed to submit.
  • Your agent operates inside those limits automatically.
Drop-in for any agent

One line of config, any agent stack.

  • MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, Zed, Cowork, Windsurf.
  • REST wrapper for Codex, Devin, Aider.
  • Plugs into Vercel preview hooks and CI pipelines.
  • No SDK to learn, no dashboard to babysit.
Plugs in wherever your agent lives

Agent-first, human-optional.

  • Your agent calls us directly over MCP or REST.
  • You can also paste a URL into the portal when you want to.
  • Or wire us into your CI preview pipeline.
What the agent sees
// Your Claude Code agent, at 2am:
// "The checkout page is built. Let me
//  send it to a uiopsy reviewer
//  before I merge this PR."

→ uiopsy.submit(previewUrl)
← 1h 42m later:
  3 issues found.
  1 critical. 2 minor.
  Fix notes attached.
§ 04 · Works with your agent

We work with whatever agent(s) you’re already running.

We fit into any agentic workflow - take your pick.

§ 05 · Before you send us anything

Important answers to great questions.

A human is about to look at whatever you submit. That should change how you think about what you send.

Q · 01

Is there an NDA?

Not by default. Enterprise plans can sign one on request.

Don’t send us anything your company wouldn’t want a stranger to see, because a real human is about to see it.

Q · 02

Where is the reviewer?

Currently in Canada. Your submissions cross a border into Canadian territory when they’re reviewed.

As the pool grows we’ll publish the list of reviewer locations so you can make an informed call about residency.

Q · 03

What counts as “sensitive” data?

Real customer PII, medical records, payment details, internal financials, anything under HIPAA, PCI, or GDPR. Production dashboards with real user data. Anything a regulator or your security team would care about.

Assume the reviewer will click every button, open every panel, and read every string. Whatever is on the page gets seen.

Q · 04

Can I just send a production URL?

Yes, for public marketing pages, pricing pages, and other surfaces that only contain information you are already comfortable showing visitors.

For anything behind auth: have your agent spin up a preview deployment with dummy data and point us at that instead. It’s what we recommend and it’s what your agent is already good at.

Q · 05

How do I stop my agent from sending the wrong thing?

Every project API key carries an environment allowlist (staging yes, production no is the common setup) and a credit spend cap. If you don’t want your agent submitting production URLs, it can’t.

Spend caps also protect you from a runaway build loop that tries to submit the same page forty times.

Q · 06

Do you train models on what I send?

No. Reviews are written by a human, for you. There is no training pipeline and no model vendor receiving your pages.

We may reference patterns we’ve seen in aggregate when writing future reviews (“this is a cliché we flagged last week”), but your specific submissions are not fed to an LLM.

Q · 07

Who else sees the review?

You and the reviewer. Reviews are not public, not shared with other customers, not indexed, and not published anywhere. Your review history lives in your operator portal and nowhere else.

Q · 08

Can I delete a review after it’s done?

Yes, from the portal. We keep audit metadata (submission timestamp, issue count, credits billed) for accounting, but the contents of the review and the URL you submitted get purged on request.

Q · 09

What if my agent submits something it shouldn’t have?

Email support@uiopsy.comwith the review ID. We wipe the submission and any materials from our side, credit you back, and tighten the key’s allowlist so it can’t happen again.

The faster you flag it, the faster we can act. The reviewer works in a human workday, so there’s almost always a window to stop a review before it starts.

Q · 10

What about iOS and Android apps?

Anything with a URL is easy. Native apps need a couple more steps.

For iOS, you’ll want to get the reviewer onto your TestFlight build.

For Android, the equivalent is a Google Play internal testing track.

Either way, it’s a one-time setup: add our reviewer’s email to your tester list and we’ll load the build on a real device.

Get in touch at support@uiopsy.comand we’ll walk you through it.

First review is on the house.